The Human Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv ) - 5790 Words

HIV The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a lentivirus (a subgroup of retrovirus) that causes HIV infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). AIDS is a condition in humans in which progressive failure of the immune system allows life-threatening opportunistic infections and cancers to thrive. Without treatment, average survival time after infection with HIV is estimated to be 9 to 11 years, depending on the HIV subtype. Infection with HIV occurs by the transfer of blood, semen, vaginal fluid, pre-ejaculate, or breast milk. Within these bodily fluids, HIV is present as both free virus particles and virus within infected immune cells. HIV infects vital cells in the human immune system such as helper T cells (specifically CD4+ T cells), macrophages, and dendritic cells. HIV infection leads to low levels of CD4+ T cells through a number of mechanisms, including apoptosis of uninfected bystander cells, direct viral killing of infected cells, and killing of infected CD4+ T cells by CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes that recognize infected cells. When CD4+ T cell numbers decline below a critical level, cell-mediated immunity is lost, and the body becomes progressively more susceptible to opportunistic infections. Comparison of HIV species Species Virulence Infectivity Prevalence Inferred origin HIV-1 High High Global Common Chimpanzee HIV-2 Lower Low West Africa Sooty Mangabey HIV is a member of the genus Lentivirus, part of the family Retroviridae.Show MoreRelatedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )1359 Words   |  6 PagesThis paper explores the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well as the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). The virus has infected two million adults and children by the year 2005 already. The virus continues to race around the world, and new HIV infections are at 50,000 per year (Martine Peeters, Matthieu Jung, Ahidjo Ayouba) (2013). The final outcome of the HIV infection is Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). There are many treatments that have developed to help the large numberRead MoreHiv And Human Immunodeficiency Virus Essay1208 Words   |  5 PagesHIV has been a pandemic that has affected the world relentlessly for many years in a never-ending circle. HIV, or Human Immunodeficiency Virus, is the virus that is spread through certain bodily fluids and can lead to AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome). HIV att acks the immune system by destroying CD4+ T cells, which leaves the person infected with HIV vulnerable to other infections, diseases, and other complications.1 Once this virus is acquired, the human can never fully rid itself of thisRead MoreHuman Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )884 Words   |  4 Pages(2010), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that affects the human immune system, leading to a chronic, progressive sickness that leaves people susceptible to opportunistic infections. When the body no longer can fight or resist infections, the condition is at this point referred to as AIDS, which means Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Averagely, it has been found to take more than ten years to develop from initial infection of HIV to AIDS. Though simple in description, HIV and AIDSRead MoreThe Human Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )862 Words   |  4 Pagesshown that the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the cause of AIDS. More than 33.4 million people worldwide are infected with the HIV virus today. HIV stands for Human Immunodeficiency virus. HIV is a virus similar to that of the flu or common cold. The differentiating factor is that with the flu and cold, your body will eventually clear the virus out of your system, but with the HIV virus, the immune system cannot clear it. Getting HIV means you have it for life. The virus immediately beginsRead MoreThe Human Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )948 Words   |  4 PagesThe Uses of Blood by the HIV Virus Blood-borne diseases have contributed greatly to poor health outcomes among individuals and communities. Though blood fulfills various functions to ensure our survival, it can also act as the mechanism through which we become diseased. Understanding the characteristics of such infectious diseases is essential to preventing further cases. In this paper I will discuss how the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) uses blood to cause illness within the infected individualRead MoreHuman Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )1261 Words   |  6 PagesHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has become more commonly seen in the world. It is important to show compassion rather than judging that patient based on a virus. The hygienist plays an important role in making the patient feel comfortable and in a judgment free environment. The patient should not feel as if the disease or virus defines the overall character of the patient. Standards precautions are still the same when treating all patients with or without a compromisingRead MoreHiv And Human Immunodeficiency Virus1205 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is HIV? HIV is a fatal disease which stands for â€Å"Human Immunodeficiency Virus† it is a failure to the immune system to protect the body from any infections. This virus causes a condition called acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. When HIV is left untreated it leads to another disease called â€Å"AIDS†. It can occur in any age, race, sex or sexual orientation. The highest risk of contracting HIV is having unprotected sex and sharing needles with others. Another factor are people that have STI’s andRead MoreThe Human Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )980 Words   |  4 Pages The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is an immune system disorder that can be contracted through sexual activity as well as other types of contact. (Healthy Living, pg. 79) If left untreated this virus can turn into AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome). AIDS is the final stage of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). (aids.gov) AIDS is an incurable progressive disease that causes gradual destruction of CD4 T cells by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). (Diseases, pg. 431) A healthyRead MoreHiv, Or Human Immunodeficiency Virus998 Words   |  4 PagesQuestion 1 HIV, or Human Immunodeficiency Virus, attacks the human immune system and greatly weakens the body’s ability to fight foreign invaders and infection. HIV first demanded notice in the early 1980s in the United States in homosexual men displaying illnesses like Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi’s sarcoma. The disease was soon observed in IV drug users, hemophiliacs, and blood transfusion recipients, but became publicized as a â€Å"gay disease,† nicknamed by the media as GRID, or Gay-RelatedRead MoreHuman Immunodeficiency Virus ( Hiv )1349 Words   |  6 Pages Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a retro virus that causes AIDs by infecting the T Helper cells of the body’s immune system. The AIDS virus is the final stages of the HIV virus. HIV is a lentivirus genus, which is a subgroup of the retrovirus that causes the AIDS virus. Even with proper treatment, an infected person has a life expectancy of less than ten years.As the virus weakens t he human immune systems, this effectleaves the patient compromised and at risk to opportunistic infections

Stereotypical Portrayal Of Gender Roles - 1841 Words

Stereotypical Gender Roles Gender roles are norms that are expected from men and women. These norms were mainly established after World War II, late 1940s to mid-1950s, when all the men returned from the war and resumed working the jobs they had left in order to join the army and the majority of the women became home care providers, while some started working jobs, such as teachers, secretaries etc†¦. Today, although this is a different era, people are still fixated on the norms that emerged through the previous eras turning them into stereotypes. A stereotype is a fixated idea about a particular person or a thing. An article by Holly Brewer called the â€Å"List of Gender Stereotypes† gives the readers an indication of some of the stereotypes that are still believed to exist and used to describe gender roles today. After such norms arose in the 1950s, multiple filmmakers adapted this idea and conveyed it into their films. One of the biggest portrayal of gender roles was depicted by Alfred Hitchcoc k in his 1954 film, Rear Window. Although the main plot of the movie revolves around the main character’s, L.B. â€Å"Jeff† Jefferies, attempt to solve a murder; the director successfully manages to illustrate the idea of gender roles stereotypes that had emerged during that era through his style of making this film, which is broken down into four categories. Hitchcock uses his editing, mise-en-scene, sound, and cinematographic style to show the stereotypical gender roles in this movie.Show MoreRelatedPortrayal Of Gender Stereotypes Of Children s Television Commercials1639 Words   |  7 Pages Portrayal of Gender Stereotypes in Children’s Television Commercials. Liuyi Bian University of Florida Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in gender portrayal in children’s television commercials. The hypothesis that stated, if an observed television program is determined to be intended for girls, then the colors used in the commercials would be predominantly intended for girls, is strongly supported. To do content analysis, we first gathered a sampleRead MoreCompare And Contrast Wonder Woman And Wonder Women1070 Words   |  5 PagesQuestion II – Compare and Contrast: Wonder Woman and The Incredibles Throughout this semester we had been discussing the portrayals of mentally ill patients via mainstream media, and how their impressions on the world through the eyes of popular culture sort of filter our vision amongst them. In successfully doing so, we then shifted toward another objective: the portrayals of gender stereotypes in both typical and atypical ways, primarily as a result of popular culture and mainstream media depictionsRead MoreManifestation of Latin-American Gender Roles in American Media1220 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿Manifestation of Latin Gender Roles in American Media Objective The objective of this study is to examine the manifestation of Latin gender roles in American Media. Towards this end, this study will examine the literature in this area of inquiry. Introduction Gender roles are reported to be generally defined as sex-based categories that specify appropriate rules of conduct for males and females in a particular culture or society. Although grounded in biological differences between males andRead MoreFeminism And Gender Roles By Margaret Atwood1518 Words   |  7 Pagesare numerous portrayals of feminism and gender roles. There are underlying hints of distaste towards the female sex role and the predatory, aggressive behaviour of men towards women. The suppression of women is portrayed and analyzed, and Surfacing manages to tackle the theme of gender roles by exploring through the perspective of the female narrator how women are marginalized in many aspects of their lives. . Surfacing makes a case for strong women that defy stereotypical gender roles and portraysRead MoreThe Stereotypical Portrayal Of Women1587 Words   |  7 PagesTo young college aged women: The stereotypical portrayal of women in media is a problem that needs to be und erstood and solved. This problem is often overlooked because it is encompassing a lot to deal with. Women are used as sexual objects in the media everywhere, and we need to understand how to deal with the issue. A large source of media that is used are advertisements, which are everywhere in our daily lives. These advertisements can make women feel degraded and objectified. Young women seeRead MoreAnalysis Of Disney Princess Films848 Words   |  4 Pagesoppressive gender messages. They find fault with the princesses serving as role models for young girls. Though, when one attentively scrutinizes the movies and compares the individualities of the princesses to the progressive woman of their time, one may obviously see the positive messages. While looking specifically at Disney princesses, the characterization of females and their roles can be described in a few ways. One, the original portrayal of Disney princesses is the stereotypical damsel-in-distressRead MoreReality Tv Shows That Portrays The Relationship Between Men And Women Essay1381 Words   |  6 Pageswomen. One of these reality TV shows includes Cheaters, which was first aired in 2000 and continues to exploit rocky relationships on TV today. Popular reality TV shows gives a depiction of what some of the norms of society is as well as the unchanged roles of women and men. Discussion The 1980’s consisted of several historical events and societal changes that have been relived though the lyrics of many young hip-hop artists. Of the numerous genres of songs, hip-hop has been labeled asRead MoreHow Heteronormative Gender Roles Are Reinforced Through Socialisation Of Popular Media? Essay1460 Words   |  6 Pagesreflecting stereotypical gender roles and cultural meanings in society. The cartoon, created by Hillenburg, conveys subliminal messages of binaries, gender roles and hierarchy. Through the characters, this essay will observe how heteronormative gender roles are reinforced through socialisation of popular media. However, closer examination also reveals a refreshingly positive and progressive attitude towards gender roles. On the one hand, characters are portrayed conforming to gender role expectationsRead MoreEssay about The Effects of Printed Media on Gender Roles1672 Words   |  7 Pagesprovide a sense of identity (even if it is a negative one!) Stereotypical judgements and stereotypical media representations can (and often do) lead to different treatments of groups by other groups, (sadly, often quite discriminatory). If we define ‘male’ and ‘female’ all we are doing is a biological classification, but if we think about the terms ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ we have to think about certain roles and lifestyles. Put simply, the words have very specificRead MoreAfrican American Women Have A Long History Of Being Political Activists958 Words   |  4 PagesCary, and Ida B. Wells were fighting for racial, social, and gender equality since slavery and the Emancipation Proclamation. Whether it is in print culture or in public culture African American women have continuously protested the treatment of African Americans and women in America. Yet, the presence of women (especially African American women) was not welcomed in America’s public domain. In fact, it deviated from acceptable gender roles. Women on the public stage receiving spotlight for their

Battle Of Britain Essay Research Paper The free essay sample

Battle Of Britain Essay, Research Paper The Battle of Britain: A Wave of Resistance Amid a Sea of Darkness As the cold manus of decease swept over the leftovers of France, British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, orated on the at hand conflict that would ramp over his fatherland and the premonition battle for endurance that was now confronting Britain: The Battle of France is over. I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to get down? The whole rage and might of the enemy must really shortly be turned on us. Hitler knows that he will hold to interrupt us in this island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the universe may travel frontward into wide sunlit highlands. But if we fail, the whole universe, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will drop into the abysm of a new Dark Age made more baleful, and possibly more drawn-out, by the visible radiations of kinky scientific discipline. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our responsibilities, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand old ages, work forces will still state, ? This was their finest hour. ? ( Hough, Richard. The Triumph of R.A.F. Fighter Pilots. New York: The McMillan Company, 1971. 9-10 ) . The Battle of Britain was greatly affected by pre-war fortunes, separated into four stages and carried effects that would impact the remainder of World War II. The result of the Battle of Britain was greatly dependent upon the fortunes, political relations and readiness of each opposing side for the at hand conflict that was to be fought. The map of Europe was awash in Nazi red as the German ground forces moved closer towards its end of domination: Adolph Hitler had conquered about all of Europe by sharp diplomatic negotiations, menace or bloody invasion. Wherever he had attacked he had conquered. In May 1940, Germany invaded Belgium, Holland and France. There were short, barbarous conflicts. The Luftwaffe swept the skies clear of the enemy, German soldiers and armored combat vehicles were exultant. The United States of America, though sympathetic to Britain, was still impersonal, and did non believe that the British state could last for long. At the central office of the British War Cabinet, Winston Churchill gazed at the map of Europe, and what he saw would hold chilled the bosom of a adult male with less bravery and nationalism than he possessed. To the North and West of Britain was unfastened sea. To the nor-east, E and South, the whole of the European coastline # 8211 ; Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium and France? was in German custodies. ( Hough 11-12 ) . To Britain, the mentality of the at hand besieging of its fatherland appeared hopeless. With the enemy environing the last fastness of the Allies, the odds against Britain were highly in the favour of the resistance: ? Britain non merely faced an enemy 10 times every bit powerful as she was on land and more than twice as powerful in the air. Invasion appeared at hand and inevitable. On July 16, Adolf Hitler issued a directing? As England despite her hopeless military state of affairs, still shows no mark of willingness to come to footings, I have decided to fix, and if necessary carry, a landing operation against her. The purpose of this operation is to extinguish the English fatherland as a base from which war against Germany can be continued? ? ( Hough 13 ) . Like the oral cavity of a leviathan gap to devour a lone Phoxinus phoxinus on the unfastened sea, the German forces faced an enemy that was non merely surrounded on three sides, but one that still tasted the rancid gall of licking at Dunkirk. The Germans planned an extended assault on Britain that would assail them from the air and on the land that was codification named Operation Sealion. Len Deighton confirms that the programs for British invasion were non complete until three yearss after the confirmed start of the conflict when he wrote, ? ? Not until 13 July did the German General Staff lay before Hitler their bill of exchange programs for? Operation Sealion? the invasion of Britain? ( Deighton, Len. Battle of Britain. New York: George Rainbird Limited, 1980. 79 ) . The program would let for the German ground forces to organize into two ground forces groups. Army Group A was to be divided into two subgroups. One would set down on the right, close Ramsgate, while the other landed on the left. Army Group B would meanwhile set about an independent mission that would blaze a way from Cherbourg to Lyme Bay. 120,000 work forces and 4,500 Equus caballuss while being protected by 650 armored combat vehicles would ab initio endorse the invading force in Army Group B. To let for the protection from enemy wing onslaughts as they blazed frontward, paratroopers were used to guarantee proper rear coverage. The following moving ridge would dwell of three armoured divisions, three motorized divisions, and nine foot units, which were so to be followed by eight foot divisions. After set uping a safe beachhead, Army Group B was to prehend a big way of the eastern part Great Britain and to cut a way that would forcibly cut off London from the remainder of the state ( Deighton 80 ) . Germany? s program for separation and conquer all depended on the political relations behind Britain? s readiness for war and the control of the air. Great Britain entered the war with changing degrees of readiness due to many factors. Winston Churchill, in a address to Parliament, pointed out the susceptibleness of Britain? s defence and the increasing hazard Germany was presenting on the universe as they increased their military strength to Parliament in the old ages before the war in hopes of carrying them to see the demand for an addition in defensive forces in Britain: We are a rich and easy quarry. No state is so vulnerable and no state would break repay loot than our ain? Yet when this authorities, this peaceable authorities, makes this modest demand upon Parliament? and experience driven by this responsibility to inquire for extra security, what is the attitude of the resistance? They have the same kind of expression of hurting and shocked surprise which came over the face of Mr. Bumble when Oliver Twist held out his small bowl and asked for more? If Germany continues this enlargement and if we continue to transport out our strategy, so, sometime in 1936, Germany will be rebelliously and well stronger in air than Great Britain? Once they have got that lead we may neer be able to catch them. ( Mason, Travis K. Battle Over Britain. New York: Doubleday and Company Incorporated, 1969. 80 ) . Even though the enforcing menace of Germany was clearly pointed out by Winston Churchill, an opposing critic, Mr. Clement Attlee followed the popular position that Britain should, ? deny the demand for increased armament? ( Mason 80 ) . The so current disposal, led by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, besides felt that an addition in defensive force was non the best way to take: Chamberlain believed that he could salvage Britain from war by moving as a diplomatic agent, keeping peace by righting grudges with dialogue and via media. In the 1930? s this policy of calming was supported by the Chiefs of Staff. Chamberlain flew to a series of meetings with Hitler to broker a colony, while at the same clip organizing policy with the Gallic and maintaining up the same force per unit area on the Czech President Benes to give land for peace. The merchandise for these attempts was the Munich Agreement, which transferred the Sudetenland to Germany under international supervising and averted war. The Agreement was met with public euphory in Britain, most of the imperativeness regarded it as a victory for Chamberlain. ( Donnelly, Mark. Britain in the Second World War. New York: Routledge, 1999. 6-7 ) . The policy of appeasement sought a via media with Germany in hopes of delighting Hitler. Britain, felt war had been averted and felt no demand for an addition in armament. Though publically accepted as the popular sentiment before the war, Winston Churchill still defied public sentiment and tried to carry Parliament of the ever-increasing German hazard before the war: Germany is already good on her manner to go, and must go, uncomparably the most heavily-armed state in the universe and the state most wholly ready for war? .We can non hold any anxiousnesss comparable to the anxiousness caused by German rearmament. ( Deighton 38 ) . Even every bit early as four old ages before the eruption of World War II, British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, spoke to the House of Commons on why Britain was ill-prepared to run into the German menace: I tell the House # 8230 ; honestly? neither I nor my advisors had any thought of the exact rate at which production could be, and really was being, speeded up in Germany in the six months between November and now ( May ) . We were wholly misled on that topic? . There has been a great trade of unfavorable judgment? . About the Air Ministry as though they were responsible for perchance an inadequate programme, for non holding gone in front faster, and for many other things? . I merely want to reiterate that whatever duties of the Government as a whole, and we are all to fault. ( Deighton 39 ) . After Churchill? s repeated warnings of Germany? s rearmament, it is evident that there was a little displacement in policy toward the readiness of Royal Air Force. The British authorities increased disbursement for the Royal Air force from17.5 million British lbs in 1934 to 73.5 million British lbs in 1938. The addition in passing entirely could non fix Britain for war without an appropriate program of action. One adult male, Sir Thomas Inskip, proposed the shift of programs and showed that Winston Churchill was non the merely 1 to acknowledge how deficient Britain was in footings of war forces: Then in December 1937, Scheme J was all of a sudden checked. Sir Thomas Inskip, Minister for the Coordination of Defense, argues that it would be excessively much and provided excessively few combatants. After drawn-out statement, in April 1938 the Cabinet accepted Scheme L, by which the RAF would make a strength of 1,352 bombers and 608 combatants by April 1940. Airmen claim that Inskip was a hapless curate who forced these steps through at a cost of terrible holds in making a heavy-bomber force simply for fiscal and political grounds, because combatants cost less than bombers. But in world, it was Inskip? s insisting on higher precedence for combatant production that gave Fighter Command the bantam border of strength by which it was able to accomplish triumph in 1940. Inskip deserves to be remembered as one of the true masters of the Battle of Britain. ( Deighton 38 ) . Increased production so helped Britain? s attempt to fix for war, but upon come ining it, many of their planes were lost seeking to salvage their Alliess from being consumed by the German moving ridge. General Dowding, Chief of RAF Fighter Command, recognized this as a lost attempt and appealed to the better senses of the Air Ministry: He put his instance frontward forcibly at a Cabinet meeting, illustrations with graphs that if the present rate of abrasion continued for a farther two hebdomads the RAF would non hold a individual Hurricane left in France? or in Britain! He followed this with his now celebrated and brave missive to the Under Secretary of State for Air, puting out his frights and inquiring for the Air Ministry to perpetrate itself as to what it considered the degree of strength needed to support Britain. This in itself won him few friends in high topographic points but it finally did the fast one. Shortly subsequently came the order from Winston Churchill that no more combatants would go forth the UK, whatever France? s demand. ( Franks, Norman. Battle of Britain. New York: Gallery Books, 1981. 11 ) . Mark Donnelly summarized Britain? s hastened efforts to fix for war when he wrote, ? In the spring and summer of 1939 Britain made readyings for a war that was progressively ineluctable ; rearmament was accelerated, air-raid shelters were built and muster began? ( Donnelly 7 ) . The British were lucky to hold been every bit prepared as they were. Because of a few unpopular sentiments that exposed the at hand menace, Britain? s policy of calming and via media was put to an terminal. Had Britain heeded warnings old ages before the war, the scarceness of planes would non hold been a job when Britain started to perpetrate its planes to the defence of its Alliess. After perpetrating legion squadrons to France, Britain determined it was a lost cause. Merely after Britain had lost a important figure of planes and pilots in France and as Germany? s range was set across the channel, did they recognize that while invasion was plausible, control of the air and domination of air would find the r esult of the Battle of Britain. It was now clear to both Britain and Germany that domination of the air was indispensable to an invasion if it were to win. Control of the air became paramount: On 30 June Goering issued a preliminary direction: ? every bit long as the enemy air force is non defeated, the premier demand is to assail it? by twenty-four hours and by dark, in the air and on the land? . ? It was understood that Hitler himself would give the word for the major air onslaught against Britain. But in the July hebdomads that followed Goering prepared to ship on a private war against the RAF over the channel. By assailing British transportation, he could coerce Fighter Command into a conflict of abrasion that must soften them up for the smasher to come. The Luftwaffe stood to win glorification and to lose nil. Hitler and his other service heads acquiesced passively. They excessively saw a conflict over the channel as a cheap, utile presentation of Germany? s might. The orders were given for the overture to the Battle of Britain. ( Deighton 81 ) . Britain? s Royal Air Force was mostly dependent on the two planes, the Hawker Hurricane and the Super Marine Spitfire. The Hurricane was equipped with heavy armour that was built to manage harm and could absorb more harm than the Spitfire but at the cost of velocity and maneuvering. It flew about 50 stat mis per hr slower than the Spitfire and responded less accurately to controls. The Spitfire was disputably the greatest air power machine in World War II. No other outmatched its velocity and control. Both planes were equipped with one engine that was produced by Rolls Royce ( Hough 17-20 ) . The German Air Force, or the Luftwaffe, had a broad array of bombers and combatants. The most to a great extent used bomber by the Germans was the JU-87 Stuka. It dove vertically and dropped a annihilating array of bombs. The German combatants who protected their squadrons of bombers consisted of BF-109 and the BF-110. The BF-109 was a single-engine plane whose chief advantages were the rate of velocity at which it dived and the rate of acceleration. Though highly fast, the BF-109 traded in handling and manoeuvrability at high velocities and was at a disadvantage against British combatants at close scope. The BF-110? s were the twin-engine version of the BF-109. Their chief aims were to assail combatants and to protect the Stufkas and other German bombers. Because of the added weight the 2nd engine added, the manoeuvrability was reduced and would therefore be a changeless casualty in the Battle of Britain. ( Hough 16 ) The pilots who operated each side? s planes had their pro? s and con? s every bit good. German combatant pilots and bombers were considered some of the best in the universe. They had an first-class truth rate of fire. The chief defects of these first pilots were their first attitudes. They had a sense of assurance that teetered on high quality composite. This outlook of complete and entire domination in the air created a drastic bead in morale when the Royal Air Force would make full the sky with planes merely every bit rapidly as the Luftwaffe would hit them down. The RAF pilots were merely every bit good trained as the Germans yet lacked the truth and discretion of the Luftwaffe. The RAF would lodge to the formation until the squadron leader would give an order. This left no room for the discretion of the pilots under the squadron leader doing them more susceptible to being? jumped? or surprised by the German Air Force. ( Hough 17-24 ) Germany? s underestimate of the RAF would let the British to work and wiled this assurance to their advantage: ( Germany ) They were justifiably contemptuous of the hazard to Germany from the RAF? s bombers, but recklessly confident that their ain would make better: ? In contrast, the Luftwaffe is in a place to travel over to decisive daytime operations owing to the unequal air defence of the island? . The Luftwaffe is clearly superior to the RAF as respects strength, equipment, preparation, bid and location of bases? . ? These were the beliefs with which the Luftwaffe went to conflict and which would take to so many bloopers in the months to come. If the British knew small about German programs to get the better of them, the Germans knew still less about their enemy. ( Deighton 80 ) . While being overly confident, they were non without the right to be a small optimistic. Harmonizing to one study, at the start of the Battle of Britain the Luftwaffe had merely over 1500 bombers with over 1000 combatants with which to protect them every bit compared to Britain? s 591 combatants with 100 more ineffective in daylight conflict ( Hough 30 ) . While the strength in Numberss decidedly belonged to the Germans, the British had a secret defence to Germany? s monolithic armory of planes. Radar. The English Channel separated Germany? s marks and their bases. They expected to meet light opposition in the air, but alternatively saw squadrons waiting for them as they passed over the channel. For a long clip, German intelligence tried to calculate out what these groups of tall towers that lined Britain? s seashore were. They had thought that it was a location sensing device, but they had small thought of how effectual and of import the radio detection and ranging was to the British defence. In, 1935 a scientist named Robert Watson-Watt sent a study to the British Air Ministry sketching the manner in which wireless could be used to place and observe enemy planes. By that autumn, towers were erected along the seashore and were able to observe planes within a fifty-mile radius. Along with radio detection and ranging, the Royal Observer Group watched for German planes through field glassess from the land. While the ROG spotted the planes from a distance, the radio detection and rang ing would enter critical information of the entrance squadrons? velocity and Numberss. This information was sent to central offices where Spitfires and Hurricanes were so quickly alerted and ordered to stop. While the radio detection and ranging was maintained, Germany neer was able to surprise the British Royal Air Force ( Hough 27-28 ) . The disadvantages and advantages of each opposing force set the phase for a dramatic and cardinal conflict of the Second World War. The Battle of Britain? s length and its exact events is frequently the topic of argument. As with many conflicts in war, events and day of the months are frequently unfastened for reading. The conflict though can be divided into four separate stages. Phase one consisted of the early examining done by the Luftwaffe of the RAF. The 2nd stage focused on Germany? s onslaughts on cardinal British defensive systems. The 3rd stage started what was known as the? Blitz? , or the onslaughts on London and other civilian sites. The 4th stage saw the Germans switch to dark bombardments and finally taper off all aerial onslaughts on Britain, therefore stoping the? Blitz? , which officially ended the Battle of Britain. ( Bickers, Richard Townshend. The Battle of Britain. New York: Prentice Hall Press, 1990. 108 ) . The Luftwaffe began the Battle of Britain by proving the abilities of the Royal Air Force and assailing important British convoys. They attacked and tested the RAF to maintain them busy and perchance weaken their defences as they prepared their military personnels for a expansive assault. They attacked the convoys, which carried coal and bulk natural stuffs, trusting to stultify Britain that had learned to depend on these convoys to prolong its state? s economic system ( Bickers 108 ) . The Germans did non be after on all out triumph in Phase one, which began on July 10, 1940. The majority of the harm done to both sides in stage one was over the coastal convoys. Many immature RAF pilots were lost due to over zealousness and over-stepping their bounds. They would frequently trail the German bombers back to France merely to be ambushed by a group of BF-109? s ( Franks 17-18 ) . Hitler wanted to flash his? superior? air force to demo how unbeatable it was. He still hoped in the dorsum o f his head that England would cut a trade after the German? s conquered the huge bulk of Europe. He did non desire to put on the line any possible colonies by bombing civilians or towns. Alternatively, he decided to destruct the convoys that scattered the Waterss environing Britain in hopes of doing the RAF to be drawn into a dogfight and have Britain waste its cherished militias ( Franks 17 ) . Goering, the German Air Force Commander, met with early success. He managed to claim three British bombers and 30,000 dozenss of merchandiser transportation ( Collier, Basil. The Second World War: A Military History. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1967. 135 ) . The British, necessitating to protect its lasting planes and its transportation convoys decided to alter its tactics: In effect of the preliminary offensive the British changed the organisation of the timing of their coastal convoys, hastened bing agreements for the recreation of ocean traffic to west-coast ports, and moved destroyers hitherto at Dover to Portsmouth. Their aircraft mills remained in full production, as did two mills, which supplied all the engines for their Hurricanes and Spitfires. Therefore they were able, during the hebdomads that divided the autumn of France from the beginning of heavy air onslaughts on Britain, to do good the deficit of combatants with which their losingss from Norway to Dunkirk had left them, take current losingss in their strode, and construct up a little force. ( Collier 135-136 ) . With the British changing convoy paths and locations, the Germans were eager to utilize other methods at droping ships: It was surely non to be assessed in footings of transporting destroyed, as over the period a whole merely 24,000 dozenss of merchandiser transportation were sunk in the Channel by aircraft. Between 10 July and 7 August 13 merchandiser ships, numbering 38,000 dozenss, were mined and sunk round the seashores of Britain, most of them by mines laid by enemy aircraft. This was about every bit much as was sunk by air onslaught ; and it was obtained at a far smaller cost to the German Air Force. ( James, T.C.G. The Battle of Britain. Great Britain: Frank Cass Publishers, 2000. 43 ) . Ultimately, the onslaughts on the convoys and stoping combatants were non a great success for either side. It showed that Britain had mistakes within their system of defence and intelligence. The Germans learned that, even with superior Numberss, they would endure great losingss if they decided to wing over the English Channel and stayed to contend: Air domination is every bit much a merchandise of morale as of stuff strength, and, that being so, Fighter Command had fared good in the July combat? ( James 45 ) . During stage one, the Luftwaffe lost about 200 aircraft and all of its downed crew while Britain suffered merely half of that and one 4th of its downed pilots. The terminal of stage one came with a displacement in tactics by the Germans: ( Walker ) . The clip of examining was at an terminal. If Hitler had any purpose Britain he had to assail in the summer, and before he did, Fighter Command had to be 500 estroyed. On 19 July Hitler made his? last entreaty to ground? address to the Reichstag? but he should hold known Britain would in no manner contemplate resignation. Hitler was confident of triumph, for in his custodies was the latest intelligence study comparing the Luftwaffe strength with that of the RAF. In its decision it showed that the Luftwaffe was clearly superior to the RAF in strength, equipment, preparation and bid. In the event of intensive air warfare the Luftwaffe would be in a place to accomplish a decisive consequence in 1940 in order to back up an invasion. What the study did non let for was the dogged, obstinate attitude of the British in general, or the skilled finding of the pilots who stood in the of German triumph. ( Franks 21 ) . With the decision of stage one, Hitler recognized that air laterality would either do or interrupt his invasion. With that, he decided to swing his mighty axe with full force into Britain? s pharynx trusting to break up the last leftovers of opposition. The clip to assail was now. The 2nd stage of the Battle of Britain focused on the devastation of the Royal Air Force Fighter Command. Heavy focal point was placed on neutralizing the RAF through the devastation of its landing fields, radio detection and ranging Stationss, and, finally, the obliteration of the aerial forces that separated Hitler from triumph ( Franks 108 ) . Leonard Mosley wrote, ? On August 13 the Luftwaffe swarmed across the Channel toward England in force. To get down with, their marks were radar Stationss? ( Mosley, Leonard. The Battle of Britain. Virginia: Time-Life Books, 1977. 111 ) . On that twenty-four hours, the German Air Force flew 1,485 sallies en masse to destruct cardinal radio detection and ranging Stationss positioned in the South of Great Britain. While destructing merely 13 British planes, they lost 45 planes and pilots that twenty-four hours ( Mosley Battle 112 ) . They hoped that by winging and destructing cardinal radio detection and ranging Stationss and landing fields, th at the RAF would be forced to go forth the land and utilize up the last of their militias to contend and support its bases and Stationss ( Collier, Richard. Eagle Day. New York: E.P. Dutton and Company. 74 ) . This worked to some extent, coercing some British planes to prosecute in conflicts they wouldn? Ts have otherwise been involved: Though the RAF pilots were still hitting back, they were aching even more than the Germans, for they had fewer planes to save. If something were non done shortly, they would shed blood to decease. Though British aircraft mills were now working at full velocity turning out planes, they could non maintain up with the losingss ; nor could work forces be trained fast plenty to replace those pilots who were killed or maimed. After Goering? s angry unfavorable judgments, the Luftwaffe redoubled its attempts to destruct the RAF. ? The enemy is to be forced to utilize his combatants by agencies of ceaseless onslaughts. In add-on, the aircraft industry and the land organisation of the air force are to be attacked? by dark and twenty-four hours, ? he had ordered. His pilots responded with finding. Around the clock the Luftwaffe was striking everyplace now where they were most likely to make injury to Britain? s defences: landing fields, aircraft mills, oil and gas terminals. They were acquirin g severely hurt, but so was the RAF, which could less afford the hurting and the agony. ( Mosley 116 ) Goering? s conflict to destruct the RAF should hold lasted merely a twosome of hebdomads, but the German? s underestimate of the RAF and their utmost over-confidence shortly became excessively much for them to manage. They were being stretched beyond their bounds. They had been winging 1,500 sallies a twenty-four hours with great losingss every clip. Goering shortly found his pilots to be dispirited as opposed to the combustion desire that still filled the RAF. The German ministry shortly put out studies of RAF casualties that were extremely inflated. Goering shortly believed that the RAF was now an air force that no longer posed a menace. Because of this, Goering called off the onslaughts on British radio detection and ranging Stationss for he saw it as a waste of planes. On the contrary, the German onslaughts on radio detection and ranging Stationss were merely get downing to hold its consequence on the RAF. The Luftwaffe had really shot a hole in Britain? s radio detection and ran ging defence and, with one more hebdomad of bombardment, would hold neutralized Britain? s radio detection and ranging system and greatly reduced Britain? s ability to support itself. Goering so went to Pas de Calais to observe with his pilots on their devastation of the RAF. When he arrived, he saw that the RAF was non merely still in being, but was doing major harm to his Luftwaffe. ? Angrily he accused his work forces of cowardliness. ? You have the best aircraft in the universe, ? he cried. ? What more do you desire? ? ? A squadron of Spitfires, ? replied Adolf Galland, one of Germany? s combatant aces. ? ( Mosley 115 ) The haughtiness and ostentation of Goering greatly affected the result of the aerial war: Goering had been a hapless pick by Hitler to run the air force. It was non that his self-indulgent lifestyle dismayed the pilots who were working hard at a great hazard to win domination in the air? or that he had accused his combatant pilots of deficiency of finding. Goering had small or no strategic or tactical experience or acumen and his proficient cognition modern warfare besides left much to be desired? with the consequence that his outlooks for the Luftwaffe were laughably over-optimistic. ( Willis, John. Churchill? s Few. New York: Paragon House Publishers, 1985. 132 ) . Great Britain held one advantage over Germany when it came to skilled air crews: While downed German pilots were a entire loss to the Luftwaffe, they were now confronting a deficit of skilled air crews: piece on the other manus, the loss of RAF pilots was being made up by an over-increasing inflow of voluntary air crews from the Dominion, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland, France, Czechoslovakia and the United States. ( Walker ) . During stage one and phase two of the Battle of Britain, merely one topographic point was safe from German onslaught: London. Goering and Hitler knew that a bombardment on the civilians of the Britain would give more ground for the United States to fall in the British cause if it saw Britain? s metropoliss laid waste and the faces of its guiltless bystanders being wiped out. Hitler ordered Goering to remain off from London. On the dark of August 24, 1940, a watercourse of bombers was doing a bomb bead on a fuel shit along the Thameshaven River when they encountered heavy flack catcher. The bombers were running out of fuel, so they dumped their lading and turned place. Small did they know that their bombs had been dropped over London. This inadvertent bombardment of London gave Churchill the alibi to alter his tactics. He ordered a bomber bid who had been commissioned to drop cusps over Germany to lade up with bombs and caput for Berlin. Goering said that if Berlin were of all time bo mbed, people could name him Meier, which was used in a derogatory sense by the Germans as it referred to Jews. On August 26, Churchill? s bombers unloaded their reprisal bombs on Berlin in the early hours of the forenoon. The RAF continued to bomb Berlin for a hebdomad directly until Hitler eventually caved in and ordered a alteration of tactics. The Luftwaffe was to concentrate on the bombardment of London as a preliminary to Operation Sealion ( Mosley 117-119 ) . With that, the effectual schemes employed by the Luftwaffe in the beginning of stage two were abandoned to settle the mark: the capital of Great Britain was to be destroyed. The Battle of Britain? s 3rd stage consisted of concentrated bombardments of the civilian population and coercing British combatants to prosecute in the air. Along with daytime bombardments, Germany coupled nighttime bombardments on London and other major industrial centres and ports, such as Liverpool to congratulate their day-to-day foraies ( Bickers 108 ) . On September 7 1940, Germany ordered the bomb onslaught that was expected by everyone except the RAF: 100 plus Nazi bombers and 300 Nazi combatants were on their manner over. RAF combatants were sent to stop as the Nazi squadrons split, as they ever did. Different squadrons heading for different marks. Dowding all of a sudden thought, what if they didn? T split up and came en masse. There would be no combatants to halt them ; the way to London would be broad unfastened. ? That? s good story, ? said Robert Wright. ? They don? T seem to be dividing up, do they? ? ( Mosley 130-131 ) . The daylight bombardment of London did a great sum of harm. This harm was coupled with a bombardment that dark. This brought the sum of civilians killed or earnestly injured to about 2,000 sum in the two bombardments. Twenty-one British squadrons went to stop the German bombing units but were frequently excessively late as the bombers had already unloaded their lading. The German Air Force lost merely forty-one aircraft while Britain lost 17 pilots and 44 combatants destroyed or badly-damaged. A immature civilian remembered his experience in London at this clip when he wrote ; ? The first bombs fell on London proper on a dark toward the terminal of August. The following bombs, as I remember fell on the dark of September 5 and 6. This onslaught was heavier and smashed several little dwellings. ? ( MacVane, John. On the Air in World War II. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1979. 15 ) . The early bombardments of the 3rd stage were concentrated on the East End. After a few yearss, German bombers moved to the West End and even managed to set down two bombs on Buckingham Palace. This eliminated the feeling that merely the hapless were being punished. This helped to convey a sense of integrity among the British people, and if anything, helped the British war cause. By the terminal of September, more than half of London? s population, largely adult females and kids, had left the metropolis ( MacVane 31 ) . The daytime run against London had done a great sum of harm but non the monolithic consequence that the Luftwaffe had anticipated: The great onslaught of 7 September was merely surprise in that London proper was to a great extent attacked for the first clip. On the 15th the conditions improved and London was once more to a great extent attacked by twenty-four hours. Thereafter, the bombardment onslaughts by twenty-four hours in sou-east continued to be made but they were comparable neither with those of the 15th, much less than the 7th. It is loosely the instance, hence, that by the center of the month the German daytime offense had lost much of its dangerousness ( James 293 ) . Adolf Galland radius of his commanding officer? s letdown in their bombardments of London and his failure to run out the RAF of its militias when he said, ? Goering was shattered, I assured him that in malice of the heavy losingss we were bring downing on the enemy combatants, no decisive lessening in their Numberss or in their combat efficiency was noticeable? ( Mosley Battle 141 ) . In the last few battles over London, German pilots were told that no more than one-hundred British planes would prosecute, yet twice that figure was reached within half of an hr of German battle. Germany on September 9, 11, and 14 used about 200 bombers on the first set of bombing with smaller Numberss on the latter two to bust London during the twenty-four hours. The Germans planned the heaviest bombardment to happen on September 15th. Two elements of bombers headed for London and were shortly met by more than 300 British aircrafts that were sent by Dowding. Germany was able to drop a important sum of bombs on London comparable to September 7th, yet lost 60 bombers making it. The deficiency of laterality by the Luftwaffe, the prominence of the RAF, and the deficiency of any clear triumphs forced Hitler to reason on September 17, that air domination was missing. He concluded that the Luftwaffe was non within mensurable distance of making the right conditions for invasion. Because of these overpowering factors, Hitler postponed invasion indefinitely, dispersed his invasion fleet and halted the assembly of invasion trade ( Collier 142-144 ) . With the evident halting of all programs to occupy Britain, Goering would do a determination that would tag the terminal of the 3rd stage and the start of the 4th stage of the Battle of Britain. With merely assorted consequences and heavy losingss to his squadrons, Goering wantonnesss confrontational daytime bombardment and dissemble his onslaughts under the screen of dark. The 4th and concluding stage of the war began as Hitler called off Operation Sealion ( Franks 108 ) . The German Air Force decided to abandon daylight bombardments for the costs were excessively great. This determination changed the coarse of the air war drastically. Goering # 8217 ; s Luftwaffe was to abandon all bombardments except at dark ( Mosley Battle 142 ) . Goering was determined to go forth a permanent feeling on Britain. The name for the dark foray was the blitz. If Goering could non eliminate the RAF, he would seek to derive triumph through bullying Britain # 8217 ; s citizens. Herbert Agar wrote, # 8220 ; On October 7 Goering defined the purposes of the blitz: # 8216 ; Progressive and complete obliteration of London # 8217 ; , paralysing Britain # 8217 ; s war potency and civil life, and # 8216 ; the demoralisation of the civil population of London and its states # 8217 ; # 8221 ; ( Agar, Herbert. The Darkest Year Britain Alone. New York: Doubleday and Company In c, 1973. 125 ) . Under a cloak of darkness, Germany # 8217 ; s air force lost the ability to visually corroborate a mark, of necessity they invented a method of leting the planes to wing a set, antecedently designed way towards their mark. A pilot would wing on a beam from radio-transmission towers in France that emitted a uninterrupted busyness every bit long as the pilot stayed on the beam? s coarse. If the pilot veered somewhat off coarse, a series of points and elans would be heard. When near the mark, a 2nd beam emitted from a separate tower intercepted the original beam and the pilot would hear a difference in sound. This meant that he would now clip his tally to a given clip interval and drop his bombs. This clever system was called the Knickebein or crooked leg. This helped to better the bombers opportunity of hitting its cardinal marks, because the Knickebein system was accurate up to about a square stat mi. The British were good cognizant of its being and had developed a method of interrupting it by the clip the blitz started. Britain would accommodate their ain wireless beacons and superimpose Morse codification on the frequence. This caused German pilots to be given false signals and would do them to overshoot and wholly lose their mark ( Mosley Battle 143 ) . Britain employed limelights, flak arms, and dark combatants to support its metropoliss from every night foraies. The immediate consequence of the blitz was a swing in impulse towards Germany and off from Britain. At the beginning, many large metropoliss and London lay unfastened to heavy German bombing. Until Britain started to implement nighttime defences against Germany, the German foraies were steady, lifelessly, and highly effectual ( Mosley Battle 143 ) . Britain had to make something to antagonize the new Luftwaffe tactics. Along with the basic defenses they had set up around London, such as flak guns and limelights, Churchill would use a new type of defence. Herbert Agar wrote, # 822 0 ; The new war, the war of the dark combatants which Churchill named the # 8216 ; wizard war # 8217 ; turned to England # 8217 ; s advantage in a few months because the British aces were better than the German 1s # 8221 ; ( Agar 128 ) . By the clip the new twelvemonth had come, Croom Johnson, a London civilian in London commented on the morale in Britain when he said, # 8220 ; The chance is well brighter than anyone would hold dared to trust at the beginning of July. Unless we get knocked out in early spring? I don # 8217 ; t see the war stoping in 1941 # 8243 ; ( Agar 128-129 ) . When Goering had foremost switched to dark bombardment, the thought that the tremendous Luftwaffe could corrupt Britain was really likely, but by the terminal of the twelvemonth, Goering could see that, # 8220 ; Within three months it was clear that they could non # 8221 ; ( Agar 129 ) . The British dark defences played a big portion in the ultimate failure of the blitz, but a significantly large r portion must be given to Goering. The demoralisation of London was taking its consequence on the East End of London. The blitz caused legion homeless and dead and was making an overpopulation endemic that was rupturing the metropolis apart. Had Goering continued the changeless foraies on, specifically the hapless and homeless that was hurt the worst by the blitz, within months, he could hold created a division between those punished and those non. This would hold caused a perchance irreparable crevice between Britain # 8217 ; s sense of integrity, but because of Goering # 8217 ; s bizarre tactics, he neer pounded steadily on one specific group leting all of Britain to the feel the hurting and therefore drawing closer together. Near the terminal of the conflict, the German # 8217 ; s noticed that the figure of German Casualties was lifting even as they had decreased the figure of sallies: In January, of 1941, the Germans lost merely three planes to the dark combatants, and in February merely four. Then in March they lost 22, In April 48 and 96 in May. The dark combatants, navigated by radio detection and ranging, had become a serious enemy to the bombers. # 8221 ; ( Agar 131 ) T.C.G. James wrote, # 8220 ; It is, in any instance, true beyond difference that the diminution in German attempt meant the checking of the black rate at which the Command had been blowing off. And this was accomplished by a force so little, confronting one so big, was an accomplishment in air warfare that has neer been equaled. # 8221 ; ( James 326 ) Germany neer invaded England, the Luftwaffe suffered great losingss, and the people of England stared into the face of evil and refused to wink. Germany would finally taper off its onslaughts on England and would garner its forces for a new forepart. Hitler decided to prosecute in a two-front war against its new enemy, Russia, and the focal point was taken off the British Isles. England remained and the Battle of Britain had been won. The Battle of Britain contained many critical mistakes that proved to be fatal to Germany? s programs for invasion and greatly deterred their war attempts for the balance of the war. Critical mistakes, in the Battle of Britain, were evident on both sides. Germany failed to concentrate their onslaughts on a specific mark, such as radio detection and ranging and the devastation of the RAF. This led to Britain being able to retrieve when Germany would draw off from their marks merely as their onslaughts were going ruinous to Britain ( Macksey, Kenneth. Military Mistakes of World War Two. Great Britain: Weaponries and Armour Press, 1987. ) : The onslaughts on the radio detection and ranging masts were called away merely as they were making lifelessly injury. The onslaughts on the land ( or underground ) Stationss which told the British pilots precisely where to assail their enemies were called away merely as they were making lifelessly injury. Later, during the night-blitz Goering neer let his combatant complete a individual occupation. ( Agar 119 ) . German intelligence besides misread the how weak Britain had become after Dunkirk, coercing them to prorogue invasion and failed to press this advantage, therefore leting Britain to retrieve and rearm: Failure to occupy England and strike hard her out of the war was finally fatal to Germany. If she had achieved that purpose in 1940 Hitler? s custodies would hold been free to prosecute his policy of picking off states, one by one, in his ain clip. Very likely the Royal Navy would hold been neutralized. Probably, cardinal points of the British Empire would hold fallen into German custodies as he created a United States of Europe under German hegemony. In which instance the President of the USA would hold agreed with Ambassador Kennedy and might hold withdrawn all aid from Britain, preferring to make a colony with a major Continental power, which, if it chose to undertake Soviet Russia ( as Hitler had already decided to make ) might be resistless. ( Macksey 46 ) . The British Intelligence used wrong information to judge Germany? s strength and it willingness to travel to war. Therefore, Britain? s critical mistake was in misinterpreting Germany? s menace and hence non being every bit prepared as possible ( Macksey 46 ) . These critical mistakes were more legion on the German side, therefore holding an inauspicious affect on their planned invasion. The Battle of Britain greatly affected the balance of the war because had Britain non won the conflict, Germany would hold invaded and implemented Colonel Professor Dr Six? s programme that called for all able-bodied work forces to be deported to work ( Bishop, Edward. Their Finest Hour. Virginia: Ballentine Books, 1968. 158 ) . Second, the Battle of Britain showed the universe that the German ground forces was non unbeatable and had a great affect on the universe? s position of Hitler? s ground forces and adversely affected his combatants? morale. Third, because of the failure to occupy Britain, Eng land bit by bit moved from a defensive stance to an violative stance in the balance of the war. Following, because Britain bumped up aircraft production during the conflict, it allowed Britain to assail Germany on their dirt while giving increased protection to their transportation lanes. Last, because of Germany? s failure to win the Battle of Britain, it was forced to a battle a two-front war against Russia on the E and Britain on the West. This affected Hitler? s efficiency and perchance the result of the war because Hitler would now hold to divide his? unbeatable? force ( Bickers 169 ) . The balance of World War II saw the Battle of Britain impacting non merely Germany? s scheme and Britain? s sovereignty, but perchance the result of the war. The Battle of Britain was greatly affected by pre-war fortunes, separated into four stages and carried effects that would impact the remainder of World War II. Although Britain faced an ground forces much greater than theirs, the fire of opposition burned merely as brilliantly confronting unsurmountable odds as it of all time had before. When World War II is remembered, people will retrieve the moving ridge of opposition that helped to turn the dark tide of an full war, and they will experience everlastingly indebted to the bravery of so few. Agar, Herbert. The Darkest Year Britain Alone. New York: Doubleday and Company Inc, 1973. Bickers, Richard Townshend. The Battle of Britain. New York: Prentice Hall Press, 1990. Bishop, Edward. Their Finest Hour. Virginia: Ballentine Books, 1968. Collier, Basil. The Second World War: A Military History. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1967. Deighton, Len. Battle of Britain.New York: George Rainbird Limited, 1980 Donnelly, Mark. Britain in the Second World War. New York: Routledge, 1999. Franks, Norman. Battle of Britain. New York: Gallery Books, 1981. Hough, Richard. The Triumph of R.A.F. Fighter Pilots. New York: The McMillan Company, 1971. James, T.C.G. The Battle of Britain. Great Britain: Frank Cass Publishers, 2000. Macksey, Kenneth. Military Mistakes of World War Two. Great Britain: Weaponries and Armour Press, 1987. MacVane, John. On the Air in World War II. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1979. Mason, Travis K. Battle Over Britain. New York: Doubleday and Company Incorporated, 1969. Mosley, Leonard. Backs to the Wall. New York: Random House, 1971. Mosley, Leonard. The Battle of Britain. Virginia: Time-Life Books, 1977. Parkinson, Roger. Summer, 1940 The Battle of Britain. New York: David Mckay Company Inc, 1977. Walker, Master Sergeant Pat. Personal Interview. 05 Mar. 2001. Willis, John. Churchill? s Few. New York: Paragon House Publishers, 1985.

My Perfect Position Chief Financial Officer

The Chief Financial Officer is among the top executives of a firm who is responsible for managing the financial risks the firm has. This position entails financial planning, record-keeping, data analysis and financial reporting to higher authorities mostly the chief executive officer or the board of directors.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on My Perfect Position: Chief Financial Officer specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More I have worked for the company for fifteen years in the finance departments, five years as a financial officer. I believe with the expansion and restructuring taking place, I am well placed to fill this new position. This paper explains my various roles, qualifications and leadership styles that will benefit the company in this position. The position of a chief financial officer is a new opening with the company, it has resulted from the expansions and restructuring taking place within the company. This position entails the management of the company’s financial risks and evaluation of accounting and financing procedures it follows. I have worked as a financial officer for the company and in this paper I have explained my qualifications to justify my position.  This position requires the holder to posses a bachelors and a master’s degree in a finance related field, a Masters of Business Administration requirement, and a certified accountancy qualification. Apart from possessing the above requirements, my ten years experience with the company in the position of a financial advisor, placed me in a good position to understand the risks it faces. The major roles I carried out entailed maintaining accounts and updating financial policies of the company. In addition my roles extended to overseeing the company’s financial and accounting reporting systems, and taxing systems. In this field, I was responsible for preparing the tax reports, and discussing quarterly company reports with the board of directors for the company’s progress. Other roles entailed directing the company’s budget to meet its goals, overseeing the investment of funds and management of risks, supervising cash management activities, and executing capital-raising strategies for purposes of expansion and restructuring of the company. Working in this position exposed me to various leadership style models, one of them is Kurt Lewin’s leadership model based on Behavioral theories (Robbins Judge, 2007, p. 78). This model describes three forms of leadership styles, which are democratic, autocratic or laissez-faire (Yukl, 2006, p. 123). This leadership framework is dependent upon the team leader’s decision making behavior, when coupled with various situations.Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The autocratic leadership style is where the leader s make decisions without even consulting or involving their teams. The team leader is the sole decision maker and every team member has to abide by the decision made by the team leader. This style is applicable where the leader is faced with situation that needs urgent solutions through quick decision making in which group decision making, will result into loss of time and may not be a successful outcome (Mintzberg, Lampel, Quinn, Ghoshal, 2003, p. 89). The autocratic leader provides a clear expectation of what he expects to be done by the group, how and when it should be done. The major weakness of this style is that it results into less creativity among team members, leads to bossy, controlling and dictatorial tendencies. The democratic leadership on the other hand involves allowing team participation by utilizing the input from each group member before making a final decision. This leadership style is viewed as the most effective as it offers guidance to group members and allows their participation and input (Mintzberg et al., 2003, p.189). The advantage of this style is that it involves group participation and makes the team members feel more motivated and creative, consequently leading to higher quality results. The disadvantage of this style is that it consumes more time in decision making and leads to less productivity.  The laissez-faire leadership style involves allowing people within the team to make many of their decisions on their own without any external influence. This delegate form of leadership is highly applicable and beneficial in situation where the delegates are highly qualified in the areas of professionalism.  The major weakness of this style is that it leads to group members making more demands to their leaders, being less productive, and this leads to poorly defined roles and lack of motivation among the team members. In conclusion, the leadership styles will determine the progress and profitability of the company. Each of the thre e styles autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire, are applicable in different sections of the company, and if well implemented the running of the company will be more efficient and satisfying. References Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J. B., Ghoshal, S. (2003). The strategy process: Concepts, contexts, cases (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on My Perfect Position: Chief Financial Officer specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Yukl, G. A. (2006). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. This report on My Perfect Position: Chief Financial Officer was written and submitted by user Br0therh00d0fEv1lMutants to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.